DXY: US Dollar’s Future Direction Hinges on 102.60

Written by Justin Bennett

|   Last Updated March 23, 2023

·     Last Updated March 23, 2023

Written by Justin Bennett 

|   Updated March 23, 2023


The US Dollar Index (DXY) fell below a critical support level following Wednesday’s FOMC.

I’ve written about the 102.60 area several times this month, noting how it’s a key horizontal, the golden pocket, and channel support.

The dollar index closed Wednesday’s session at 102.53, marginally below the key level.

However, FOMC-driven moves are prone to failing later in the week.

It doesn’t mean that will happen with the DXY, but the next two trading days will tell us a lot about the dollar’s future direction.

If dollar bulls can reclaim the 102.55/60 area on a 4-hour and daily closing basis, a rally back to the 103.50 yearly open is likely.

Alternatively, further dollar weakness is probable if Thursday and Friday hold below the 102.60 area.

The downside target if the DXY cannot reclaim 102.60 is the 101.25 range lows.

The 101.25 area served as support last May and triggered the bounce last month.

If bulls secure the 102.60 reclaim, the 103.50 yearly open is the next test, followed by 104.12.

What happens with the dollar index this week concerning 102.60 will be a key driver for EURUSD and even pairs like USDJPY and GBPUSD.

Join us in Discord to watch today’s members-only video on the DXY, EURUSD, GBPUSD, and USDJPY

DXY key levels
DXY 4-hour time frame
Bottom of post CTA
Bottom of post CTA

Justin Bennett - founder of Daily Price Action

About the author

Justin Bennett started trading in 2002, and let's just say it was a bumpy ride. But in 2010, he had his "aha" moment once he ditched the indicators and focused 100% on price action. Justin has built a following of 100,000+ monthly readers and taught thousands of traders using his simple, no-nonsense approach. He's been highlighted as a top trader by Stocks and Commodities Magazine and regularly featured by Forex Factory next to publications from Bloomberg and CNBC. ...Read More


Continue Learning


{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}